Search This Blog
11 January 2012
A life exam
Following on Alain de Botton's essay on Montaigne, I post here a version of de Botton's an examination on wisdom. I'd be interested to see your answers. Remember, I am interested in your ideas, nothing more. You get an 'A' just for taking the test, in my book at least. Begin:
1. What is a good parent?
2. How can one tell if one is in love or infatuated?
3. How much regard should one have for oneself, and why?
4. How much weight should one give to what other people think?
5. How should one deal with death?
6. How should one end a relationship?
7. How can one live happily with other people?
8. What does it mean to be wise?
9. What is the good life?
10. What does it mean to be a friend?
Extra Credit: What is the meaning of your existence?
07 January 2012
An excerpt of this novel I cannot seem to finish
I stood beneath
the lamp post in front of my building and looked up and down the sidewalks,
across the street, and up at the windows of my neighbors. All was quiet and still, though it was
only just after 10pm. I have
always been a night owl of sorts, and have lived in many places where
observable nocturnal adventures are common, but here people went inside early
and, though they may not be sleeping, or may be having unobservable nocturnal
adventures, the windows and doors in this city close early to the
observer. What a challenging city
this must be for the voyeur, or the peeping Tom, at least at night, during the
hours when it is most fruitful and interesting to observe people in
secret. Of course, observance with
the ears was a different matter.
Nothing could be heard at this time of night down on the street, but
often I had heard the sounds of my neighbors through the walls, or through the
pipes if I stood quiet enough and listened, or put my ear to the plumbing. I could rarely ever hear distinct
words, but I could hear the music of conversations, the loud clashes of angry
overtures and the sotto voce of banal melody and chitchat. As the night progressed, talking was
replaced by amatory sounds, most often coming from the young married couple who
lived next to me. Grunts, moans,
an occasional scream. Once, when
the husband was away for the night after I had heard yelling from both of them
throughout the afternoon, there was an exceptionally loud explosion of moans
and screams, and the voice of a strange man yelling “oh god, mmmm” at the top
of his lungs, followed by an hour of silence and, later, by female weeping and
the sound of the man leaving, swearing as he went. Often after, whenever I
would chance to meet the couple, or worse, the husband alone outside the
building or in the hallway in front of our doors, I felt a sense of guilt,
because I had been made an unwilling and unsuspected accomplice to the young woman’s
infidelity by my own proclivities.
I carried that knowledge, and yet did nothing, said nothing. A few days after their fight, I
happened upon the husband in the hallway, and he waved and offered an apology
for the noise of a few days ago.
That was what he said: ‘Sorry about the noise a few days ago.’ The noise of a few days ago! Like he had any idea of the true nature
of the noises that came from his own bedroom that night he spent away. Yet, I couldn’t tell him what I knew,
all auditory and circumstantial and gathered by me in a dubious manner as I
listened against the wall. And I
suspected, perhaps only as justification, that the husband might have been
occupying someone else’s bed that night as well, and that there could be
another soul out there entrusted with the same silent burden of having
overheard an infidelity, though they might not know the encounter was an
infidelity at all. The young
couple possessed all of the passions of youth – they were roughly the same age
as my students –and the same impulsive flare for folly. ‘You won’t last,’ I often thought to
myself, passing judgment. ‘You’re
irresponsible and young. Your
passions will devour you. Your
flame will go out. You will grow
bored or disgusted with each other.
You cannot even whether the storm of a single evening without recourse
to an outsider’s touch, to cuckolding the one you love.’ Then I followed that though with a
reprimand: ‘I don’t know a thing about them. What do I know?’
I stood on the
street observing the shut blinds and extinguished lights, and I thought I did
know, not just about them, but about Maria as well, about what I had seen when
I looked at her, about how I’d begun to read her when she was upstairs in my
apartment, and how she had read me, too – she could also read people very well,
much better than I could, or ever would – and I thought I knew this despite
some of the truth in Maria’s words about the past. Perhaps the past is a fiction of sorts, in that we have to
remake it as we recall it, and in that our memories can never be trusted to be
faithful, because our memories are like irresponsible young lovers. Perhaps. Yet, the very existence of the past has become something to
be despised. Teachers, especially
teachers of the past, are told to make the material relevant to the student, to
make it fresh and exciting and interesting. The assumption is that the material can never be interesting
to a modern student until it involves them in some way. In other words, the past must be
spruced up to account for the selfishness of the present. People don’t want to think that great
and horrible things happened and they weren’t around to witness it, that it had
nothing to do with them and their world.
Even events such as the holocaust that robbed Maria’s old woman of her
family are not mentioned for the reason that they once existed, they are
unalterable facts, but because someone saw a movie about the event and wants to
overlap an opinion over history, wants to involve themselves, wants to give a
review, thumbs up or down, or wants to inject their sympathy or pity, which
gives nothing to the people of the past.
These interlopers are like the callers on the bridge that day Jala
jumped to her death, reporting to their unseen confessors the events, not
because they happened, but because they were witnessed. And am I not as guilty in remembering
all of this? Few are the ones who
see the past independently from themselves, with dispassionate interest. And because of this selfishness, people
often say that some long past event ‘just doesn’t interest me’ but they never
stop to think why that might be.
We fictionalize our pasts and our memories, but there are facts, events,
melodramas, happening even now that we want no part of, because on them we
cannot impose ourselves. And we
choose not to see things as they are because to do so is to make a judgment,
and such things are impossible to do on unconnected things by those who cannot
see past themselves, cannot impose themselves, or superimpose themselves on the
lives of others. And worse is when
we impose ourselves where we shouldn’t.
How arrogant modern leaders are in offering apologies for the sins of
their long-dead predecessors, and how equally vile those who accept them as if
any of them have any right to speak for the dead, as if their apologies and
forgiveness carry any weight for the victims of former ages, as if any
consolation can be given to the past.
The past, and the dead of the past, stand alone, separate and
inconsolable, pale abstracted mourners, alone in the loneliness of this hour of
the dead. And this I would learn
in the weeks after Jala’s death.
I turned away from
the shut windows and silence of the building and leaned against the door frame,
as Maria had a few hours before, and I pulled my coat closer to me as the chill
of the night began to take bigger bites at my flesh. In the distance, there was dull light, growing brighter and
more distinct as it drew closer, until it was very bright. I put my hand up to shield my eyes, and
was able to make out the headlights and top light of the taxicab. It pulled up beside me, and I got
inside.
31 October 2011
I progress as I digress
I'll be writing more on this topic later, especially as it involves writing about sex, but I wanted to make an observation on something I find important: digression. That is, I find things more entertaining, more illuminating, the more digressive they are (up to a point). I'm just going to use an example from that crappy novel I'm reworking before I send it off to meet its fate. Option A is a simple statement of what might happen at that moment when you look at someone and 'connect.'
We looked at each other and all of the walls between us came down.
Now, this is crap. It is crap initially because it is a cliché, and also because it tells you something without letting you experience it. Digressions can be ways of thinking. Now, option B is a digression, though it is hampered by my skill as a writer. Stil, it is more interesting than option A.
But, I digress.
We looked at each other and all of the walls between us came down.
Now, this is crap. It is crap initially because it is a cliché, and also because it tells you something without letting you experience it. Digressions can be ways of thinking. Now, option B is a digression, though it is hampered by my skill as a writer. Stil, it is more interesting than option A.
In that moment
when her eyes met mine, the complete mystery of her background, of her lineage
and personal history, of the contradictions she herself encouraged, dropped
away and she was – there is no more certain way to put this – translated for
me. She was no longer descended
from soccer star progenitors or revolutionaries. The memory of the grace of her previous turn and farewell
receded. I could see in her
another place, a place existing far away, a large house in a lush climate,
columned front porches, hot late afternoons, and lemonade, men with well-trimmed
beards wearing seersucker suits and sitting on dark-wood chairs in the shade of
the porch, talking business and laughing, and women inside talking to each
other, fanning themselves, their voices less exuberant but more knowledgeable
than the voices of the men, each one glancing out onto the porch occasionally,
looking at their husband, or at the other husbands, and moving among these
women in their lace and dresses, almost unnoticed, a little girl with black
curls and black eyes, with childhood innocence, which is temporary and always
close to dangerous extinction from the inconsiderate adult world in which
children must survive, a girl as intelligent as the adults, but clothed in the
hopes of the unknown future. This
girl was also watching the men outside, especially her father, the man in the
largest of the chairs, the man who owned this porch and this grand house and
who, every Sunday after the little girl returned from Mass, took her by the
hand and walked with her, singing old ballads to her, or whistling snippets of
waltzes as he hopped and trotted, laughing as he missed a note, and laughing
harder as she laughed too, her little feet trying to copy his in dance. The little girl watched her father on
the porch, and all of the disappointments of life, the compromises one makes
with the world and with oneself, the observation of the falling from grace
which is the lot of every parent, even those who are in some way forever
idealized, and which every child experiences in some way…all of these minor catastrophes
were still unformed, perhaps avoidable, and yet inevitable. I have since come to know Maria’s
story, and so I am sure I did not really see all of this, but I did yet see
some of it. And at this moment, I
also ceased thinking of the woman I had seen go to her death on the bridge, and
thought only of the woman before me. Maria looked tired, but I saw something of my future in her, either a
brief future in my bed or, perhaps a more distant future, which is what it has
become. I hastened my steps as I
crossed the street.
20 October 2011
The Horror-scope
Imagine opening your Sunday paper to a small section called
‘Ethnicities.’ Here is what you
find:
Jews: work smarter rather than harder in order to maximize
the opportunities that come your way
African-American: Don't get discouraged by your lack of direction
Asians: Don't bother attempting to justify your actions
because your explanations will just grow increasingly convoluted. Keep things
as simple as you can and try to finish whatever you begin.
Caucasians: Push steadily toward your goals because you have
the necessary inner resolve to overcome most obstacles now. Set your mind on
your destination and then don't let anything or anyone distract you.
And so on.
I personally find this sort of thing both offensive and
limiting. But let me explain. I have made up the categories of
ethnicity and simply copied the first few horoscopes I found online to fill in
the information. It is strange
that reading how African-Americans shouldn’t be discouraged by a lack of
direction feels a tad racist, but saying the same thing about someone born at
the end of March is completely acceptable, and printable.
Horoscopes have no scientific backing, and are indeed based
currently on out of date astronomy.
Chances are, you are not the sign you think you are. Yet, at best horoscopes are thought of
as harmless diversions. We can
laugh at their predictions and point to the generic makeup of their
advice. “Finish whatever you begin”
is sound advice to Spring babies as well as those born just before the first
Winter snow. So what could be so
bad in a little fun.
Well, the problem, as with most things, comes from those who
go in wholesale on a superstitious idea.
A great many people actually do, to a certain extent, attempt to adjust
their lives according to these little snippets of rubbish. Love advice often warns one sign
against getting involved with another (I couldn’t possibly date Pisces!),
denying possibilities to the believer. Being warned against another because of supernatural reasons is never good.
Yet, my greatest problem with horoscopes comes from my
example above. When used with race
or religion, it is offensive. We
are sensitive to stereotypes based on differences in geography. We shun blanket statements about other
human beings separated bt physical space.
Yet, we have become accustomed to stereotypes based on distances in time,
separations in temporal space.
Even good natured, they are groundless and distracting. As a species, in an age of growing
nationalism, fundamentalism, and sectarianism, the last thing we need right now
is to be separated by arbitrary, and in this case imaginary, divides.
We need things, even diversions, which
illuminate how we are all a part of the human family, not how we are alien to
each other according to some cosmic mumbo jumbo.
08 October 2011
Narrators who confound.
One of my favorite lines from one of my favorite books with
an unreliable narrator is this:
“This is the saddest story I’ve ever heard.” Ford Maddox Ford’s The Good Soldier may be one of the greatest novels ever written, and
I cannot argue with Jane Smiley’s opinion that it is one of the most
stylistically perfect novels in any language. The experience of reading it is tremendous, and it ranks
high among other works with such narrators, like Lolita. Sadly,
I haven’t come across many books as good at deploying the use of the unreliable
narrator...until now.
Horacio Castellanos Moya’s The She-Devil in the Mirror is, on the surface, a murder mystery, and underneath
a fierce examination of society in collapse. Olga Maria has been gunned down in front of her children,
and the whole aftermath is narrated for us through incessant dialog by a
shallow young socialite. As the
wake progresses, all the right people show up, and Laura Rivera talks about her
best friend, we see just what sort of narrator we have: “Come on, come with me, let’s see how
she looks. Look at those gorgeous
flower arrangements: Marito’s
advertising agency sent them over.
I told you that’s her best dress – don’t you think she looks gorgeous,
they did a good job on her, you can barely even see the hole in her head. Life is a catastrophe. How could this have happened to
her? You went to her last birthday
party, remember...those cowards (who shot her) should be killed! Doesn’t her hair look great?” And so on. While she prattles on, trying to solve the mystery of her
friend’s death, we learn that Olga Maria was something of a tramp, and that our
narrator is no better. One minute
“vulgar is as vulgar does, and it disgusts me” and “all those poor people,
theives and whores,” to a page later, “when we finished, lying in the hammock,
my pussy red and swollen from so much in and out, I asked him if he’d done it
like that with Olga Maria?” And
underneath it all, beyond the grasp of our vacuous tour guide, is the
corruption and history of violence of San Salvador, which we catch in
glimpses. As the novel progresses,
Laura slowly goes mad, and justice becomes more and more opaque. Her narration becomes more fevered,
more disgusted with the filth around her.
But she has yet to look in the mirror.
This is a great, terrifying book. I suspected I would find the social scene of the novel
foreign, but it was frighteningly familiar. Perhaps the she devil in the mirror isn’t Laura’s society, but ours.
10 September 2011
French tidbits
I’ve
been reading Graham Robb’s Parisians: an adventure history of Paris with unexpected delight. The research is meticulous, yet the prose is light and
quick. The anecdotes are
fascinating: Napoleon’s youthful encounter with a prostitute before his rise to
power, Marie Antoinette’s failed escape due to want of a good map, and so
on. Great reading.
From
the book I learned that Paris once had a street named Rue d’Enfer, the road of
hell. In 1774, a great chasm
suddenly opened up forming a sinkhole.
Several houses on the Rue d’Enfer were swallowed up by the earth. This event lead architectural genius
Charles-Axel Guillaumot to discover that most of the city was in peril due to
ancient mining tunnels snaking through the ground below houses, churches, and
taverns alike. Half the city was
propped up on unstable piles of quarried stones. He rebuilt the Parisian underground, and the name of the
street was changed.
While
it is understandable that people at the time believed the road was named
prophetically, the etymology of the street name was mysterious. Today, the source is considered
unknown, but etymologists of the period were somewhat more inventive, in all
senses of the word:
“in the days of
the Romans, the Rue St. Jacques was the Via Superior, while this street, being
the lower of the two, was the Via Inferior or Infera. And so it was that, by corruption and contraction, it
assumed the name ENFER.”
(Hurtaut and Magny, Dictionnaire
historique de la ville de Paris et de ses environs. Paris, 1779.)
I prefer the old to the new. Happy reading.
04 September 2011
Richard’s six books for the end of summer
The cool weather outside has reminded me that glorious summer is coming to an end, and that we who live in the tundra must get out and enjoy it while we can. It has also reminded me that the peculiar season known as ‘Summer reading’ is also coming to a close, so here I offer six books to get that last bit of ‘fun’ reading in before the more serious tomes are taken up, the textbooks are cracked open, or the office spreadsheets begin to propagate in depressing numbers. The first three books are fiction and, while they are not light, they are also not Ulysses. The second three books are nonfiction, and are a little more serious without being heavily academic.
- Memories of My Melancholy Whores by Gabriel García Márquez
- The Summer Book by Tove Jansson
- A Heart So White by Javier Marías
- Monsters of the Gévaudan: the making of a beast by Jay M. Smith
- Homage to Catalonia by George Orwell
- Ideas That Matter by A. C. Grayling
Happy reading!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















