Search This Blog

01 March 2012

2011's best books

 


Late as it is (I seem to be living, like the young lady above, in a bubble), I present to you a list of the books I most enjoyed reading in 2011.  Most were first-time reads, but I always find myself revisiting a few books every year.  (All artwork in this post was made by the amazing Emilia Szewczyk).


Fiction

  1. Your Face Tomorrow by Javier Marías.  The three-volume masterwork of the 21st century.  Our Proust. 
  2. The She Devil in the Mirror by Horacio Castellanos Moya.  See my post on this intriguing novel.
  3. Memories of My Melancholy Whores by Gabriel García Márquez.  Who ever thought a book about a 90 year-old man with a penchant for whoring with under-aged girls could be such a tender and beautiful love story?  I hope there is yet another book left for the master to write.  Each one is a gift to the world.
  4. The Adventures and Misadventures of Maqroll by Alvaro Mutis.  A romantic fatalist?  Maqroll is the descendant of Quixote and Don Juan, a man who chases dreams, opens his heart, and accepts life and death as traveling companions.  Funny, moving, brilliant tales of an adventurer who, after I read the stories, seemed more real and alive than most people I have ever met.
  5. King Lear by William Shakespeare.  “Nothing can come of nothing.  Speak again” (I.i.92).  I have a soft spot in my heart for Hamlet, but this may be the most complex, and honest, of Shakespeare’s plays.  The idea of loving one child more than another, notions of betrayal by the ones we love most, our silly vanities, our legacies...these all come into play.  I still think about certain lines.



Non-Fiction

  1. Moscow 1812: Napoleon’s fatal march by Adam Zamoyski.  Brutal folly, tender mercy, ruthless treachery.  A great read of a turning point in history.
  2.  How to be an Existentialist by Brian Cox.  A fun little book on my favorite philosophy.
  3. Ideas That Matter: the concepts that shape the 21st century by A. C. Grayling.  An opinionated, sometimes amusing, and always erudite guide to key subjects of the modern world.
  4. A Thousand Times More Fair: what Shakespeare’s plays teach us about justice by Kenji Yoshino.  The NYU law professor provides an intriguing look into the bard in light of our modern ideas of justice within and outside of legal systems.
  5. Shakespeare the Thinker by A. D. Nuttall.  The best book on Shakespeare in the last 25 years.



In a category by itself

Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes.  This is the greatest novel ever written, and for me, the most profound.  When the errant knight dies, I literally wept.  I will be reading it again this, and every, year.
So, grab a cup of coffee and read something.

 

11 January 2012

A life exam



Following on Alain de Botton's essay on Montaigne, I post here a version of de Botton's an examination on wisdom.  I'd be interested to see your answers.  Remember, I am interested in your ideas, nothing more.  You get an 'A' just for taking the test, in my book at least.  Begin:




1.  What is a good parent?

2.  How can one tell if one is in love or infatuated?

3.  How much regard should one have for oneself, and why?




4.  How much weight should one give to what other people think?

5.  How should one deal with death?


6.  How should one end a relationship?


7.  How can one live happily with other people?


8.  What does it mean to be wise?


9.  What is the good life?


10.  What does it mean to be a friend?







Extra Credit:  What is the meaning of your existence?

07 January 2012

An excerpt of this novel I cannot seem to finish

 
I stood beneath the lamp post in front of my building and looked up and down the sidewalks, across the street, and up at the windows of my neighbors.  All was quiet and still, though it was only just after 10pm.  I have always been a night owl of sorts, and have lived in many places where observable nocturnal adventures are common, but here people went inside early and, though they may not be sleeping, or may be having unobservable nocturnal adventures, the windows and doors in this city close early to the observer.  What a challenging city this must be for the voyeur, or the peeping Tom, at least at night, during the hours when it is most fruitful and interesting to observe people in secret.  Of course, observance with the ears was a different matter.  Nothing could be heard at this time of night down on the street, but often I had heard the sounds of my neighbors through the walls, or through the pipes if I stood quiet enough and listened, or put my ear to the plumbing.  I could rarely ever hear distinct words, but I could hear the music of conversations, the loud clashes of angry overtures and the sotto voce of banal melody and chitchat.  As the night progressed, talking was replaced by amatory sounds, most often coming from the young married couple who lived next to me.  Grunts, moans, an occasional scream.  Once, when the husband was away for the night after I had heard yelling from both of them throughout the afternoon, there was an exceptionally loud explosion of moans and screams, and the voice of a strange man yelling “oh god, mmmm” at the top of his lungs, followed by an hour of silence and, later, by female weeping and the sound of the man leaving, swearing as he went. Often after, whenever I would chance to meet the couple, or worse, the husband alone outside the building or in the hallway in front of our doors, I felt a sense of guilt, because I had been made an unwilling and unsuspected accomplice to the young woman’s infidelity by my own proclivities.  I carried that knowledge, and yet did nothing, said nothing.  A few days after their fight, I happened upon the husband in the hallway, and he waved and offered an apology for the noise of a few days ago.  That was what he said: ‘Sorry about the noise a few days ago.’  The noise of a few days ago!  Like he had any idea of the true nature of the noises that came from his own bedroom that night he spent away.  Yet, I couldn’t tell him what I knew, all auditory and circumstantial and gathered by me in a dubious manner as I listened against the wall.  And I suspected, perhaps only as justification, that the husband might have been occupying someone else’s bed that night as well, and that there could be another soul out there entrusted with the same silent burden of having overheard an infidelity, though they might not know the encounter was an infidelity at all.  The young couple possessed all of the passions of youth – they were roughly the same age as my students –and the same impulsive flare for folly.  ‘You won’t last,’ I often thought to myself, passing judgment.  ‘You’re irresponsible and young.  Your passions will devour you.  Your flame will go out.  You will grow bored or disgusted with each other.  You cannot even whether the storm of a single evening without recourse to an outsider’s touch, to cuckolding the one you love.’  Then I followed that though with a reprimand: ‘I don’t know a thing about them.  What do I know?’
I stood on the street observing the shut blinds and extinguished lights, and I thought I did know, not just about them, but about Maria as well, about what I had seen when I looked at her, about how I’d begun to read her when she was upstairs in my apartment, and how she had read me, too – she could also read people very well, much better than I could, or ever would – and I thought I knew this despite some of the truth in Maria’s words about the past.  Perhaps the past is a fiction of sorts, in that we have to remake it as we recall it, and in that our memories can never be trusted to be faithful, because our memories are like irresponsible young lovers.  Perhaps.  Yet, the very existence of the past has become something to be despised.  Teachers, especially teachers of the past, are told to make the material relevant to the student, to make it fresh and exciting and interesting.  The assumption is that the material can never be interesting to a modern student until it involves them in some way.  In other words, the past must be spruced up to account for the selfishness of the present.  People don’t want to think that great and horrible things happened and they weren’t around to witness it, that it had nothing to do with them and their world.  Even events such as the holocaust that robbed Maria’s old woman of her family are not mentioned for the reason that they once existed, they are unalterable facts, but because someone saw a movie about the event and wants to overlap an opinion over history, wants to involve themselves, wants to give a review, thumbs up or down, or wants to inject their sympathy or pity, which gives nothing to the people of the past.  These interlopers are like the callers on the bridge that day Jala jumped to her death, reporting to their unseen confessors the events, not because they happened, but because they were witnessed.  And am I not as guilty in remembering all of this?  Few are the ones who see the past independently from themselves, with dispassionate interest.  And because of this selfishness, people often say that some long past event ‘just doesn’t interest me’ but they never stop to think why that might be.  We fictionalize our pasts and our memories, but there are facts, events, melodramas, happening even now that we want no part of, because on them we cannot impose ourselves.  And we choose not to see things as they are because to do so is to make a judgment, and such things are impossible to do on unconnected things by those who cannot see past themselves, cannot impose themselves, or superimpose themselves on the lives of others.  And worse is when we impose ourselves where we shouldn’t.  How arrogant modern leaders are in offering apologies for the sins of their long-dead predecessors, and how equally vile those who accept them as if any of them have any right to speak for the dead, as if their apologies and forgiveness carry any weight for the victims of former ages, as if any consolation can be given to the past.  The past, and the dead of the past, stand alone, separate and inconsolable, pale abstracted mourners, alone in the loneliness of this hour of the dead.  And this I would learn in the weeks after Jala’s death.
I turned away from the shut windows and silence of the building and leaned against the door frame, as Maria had a few hours before, and I pulled my coat closer to me as the chill of the night began to take bigger bites at my flesh.  In the distance, there was dull light, growing brighter and more distinct as it drew closer, until it was very bright.  I put my hand up to shield my eyes, and was able to make out the headlights and top light of the taxicab.  It pulled up beside me, and I got inside.

31 October 2011

I progress as I digress

I'll be writing more on this topic later, especially as it involves writing about sex, but I wanted to make an observation on something I find important: digression.  That is, I find things more entertaining, more illuminating, the more digressive they are (up to a point).  I'm just going to use an example from that crappy novel I'm reworking before I send it off to meet its fate.  Option A is a simple statement of what might happen at that moment when you look at someone and 'connect.'

We looked at each other and all of the walls between us came down.


Now, this is crap.  It is crap initially because it is a cliché, and also because it tells you something without letting you experience it.  Digressions can be ways of thinking.  Now, option B is a digression, though it is hampered by my skill as a writer.  Stil, it is more interesting than option A.

 
In that moment when her eyes met mine, the complete mystery of her background, of her lineage and personal history, of the contradictions she herself encouraged, dropped away and she was – there is no more certain way to put this – translated for me.  She was no longer descended from soccer star progenitors or revolutionaries.  The memory of the grace of her previous turn and farewell receded.  I could see in her another place, a place existing far away, a large house in a lush climate, columned front porches, hot late afternoons, and lemonade, men with well-trimmed beards wearing seersucker suits and sitting on dark-wood chairs in the shade of the porch, talking business and laughing, and women inside talking to each other, fanning themselves, their voices less exuberant but more knowledgeable than the voices of the men, each one glancing out onto the porch occasionally, looking at their husband, or at the other husbands, and moving among these women in their lace and dresses, almost unnoticed, a little girl with black curls and black eyes, with childhood innocence, which is temporary and always close to dangerous extinction from the inconsiderate adult world in which children must survive, a girl as intelligent as the adults, but clothed in the hopes of the unknown future.  This girl was also watching the men outside, especially her father, the man in the largest of the chairs, the man who owned this porch and this grand house and who, every Sunday after the little girl returned from Mass, took her by the hand and walked with her, singing old ballads to her, or whistling snippets of waltzes as he hopped and trotted, laughing as he missed a note, and laughing harder as she laughed too, her little feet trying to copy his in dance.  The little girl watched her father on the porch, and all of the disappointments of life, the compromises one makes with the world and with oneself, the observation of the falling from grace which is the lot of every parent, even those who are in some way forever idealized, and which every child experiences in some way…all of these minor catastrophes were still unformed, perhaps avoidable, and yet inevitable.  I have since come to know Maria’s story, and so I am sure I did not really see all of this, but I did yet see some of it.  And at this moment, I also ceased thinking of the woman I had seen go to her death on the bridge, and thought only of the woman before me.  Maria looked tired, but I saw something of my future in her, either a brief future in my bed or, perhaps a more distant future, which is what it has become.  I hastened my steps as I crossed the street.
But, I digress.

20 October 2011

The Horror-scope




Imagine opening your Sunday paper to a small section called ‘Ethnicities.’  Here is what you find:

Jews: work smarter rather than harder in order to maximize the opportunities that come your way

African-American: Don't get discouraged by your lack of direction

Asians: Don't bother attempting to justify your actions because your explanations will just grow increasingly convoluted. Keep things as simple as you can and try to finish whatever you begin.

Caucasians: Push steadily toward your goals because you have the necessary inner resolve to overcome most obstacles now. Set your mind on your destination and then don't let anything or anyone distract you.

And so on.

I personally find this sort of thing both offensive and limiting.  But let me explain.  I have made up the categories of ethnicity and simply copied the first few horoscopes I found online to fill in the information.  It is strange that reading how African-Americans shouldn’t be discouraged by a lack of direction feels a tad racist, but saying the same thing about someone born at the end of March is completely acceptable, and printable. 

Horoscopes have no scientific backing, and are indeed based currently on out of date astronomy.  Chances are, you are not the sign you think you are.  Yet, at best horoscopes are thought of as harmless diversions.  We can laugh at their predictions and point to the generic makeup of their advice.  “Finish whatever you begin” is sound advice to Spring babies as well as those born just before the first Winter snow.  So what could be so bad in a little fun.

Well, the problem, as with most things, comes from those who go in wholesale on a superstitious idea.  A great many people actually do, to a certain extent, attempt to adjust their lives according to these little snippets of rubbish.  Love advice often warns one sign against getting involved with another (I couldn’t possibly date Pisces!), denying possibilities to the believer.  Being warned against another because of supernatural reasons is never good.


Yet, my greatest problem with horoscopes comes from my example above.  When used with race or religion, it is offensive.  We are sensitive to stereotypes based on differences in geography.  We shun blanket statements about other human beings separated bt physical space.  Yet, we have become accustomed to stereotypes based on distances in time, separations in temporal space.  Even good natured, they are groundless and distracting.  As a species, in an age of growing nationalism, fundamentalism, and sectarianism, the last thing we need right now is to be separated by arbitrary, and in this case imaginary, divides.  


 We need things, even diversions, which illuminate how we are all a part of the human family, not how we are alien to each other according to some cosmic mumbo jumbo.

08 October 2011

Narrators who confound.

 
One of my favorite lines from one of my favorite books with an unreliable narrator is this:  “This is the saddest story I’ve ever heard.”  Ford Maddox Ford’s The Good Soldier may be one of the greatest novels ever written, and I cannot argue with Jane Smiley’s opinion that it is one of the most stylistically perfect novels in any language.  The experience of reading it is tremendous, and it ranks high among other works with such narrators, like Lolita.  Sadly, I haven’t come across many books as good at deploying the use of the unreliable narrator...until now.


Horacio Castellanos Moya’s The She-Devil in the Mirror is, on the surface, a murder mystery, and underneath a fierce examination of society in collapse.  Olga Maria has been gunned down in front of her children, and the whole aftermath is narrated for us through incessant dialog by a shallow young socialite.  As the wake progresses, all the right people show up, and Laura Rivera talks about her best friend, we see just what sort of narrator we have:  “Come on, come with me, let’s see how she looks.  Look at those gorgeous flower arrangements:  Marito’s advertising agency sent them over.  I told you that’s her best dress – don’t you think she looks gorgeous, they did a good job on her, you can barely even see the hole in her head.  Life is a catastrophe.  How could this have happened to her?  You went to her last birthday party, remember...those cowards (who shot her) should be killed!  Doesn’t her hair look great?”  And so on.  While she prattles on, trying to solve the mystery of her friend’s death, we learn that Olga Maria was something of a tramp, and that our narrator is no better.  One minute “vulgar is as vulgar does, and it disgusts me” and “all those poor people, theives and whores,” to a page later, “when we finished, lying in the hammock, my pussy red and swollen from so much in and out, I asked him if he’d done it like that with Olga Maria?”  And underneath it all, beyond the grasp of our vacuous tour guide, is the corruption and history of violence of San Salvador, which we catch in glimpses.  As the novel progresses, Laura slowly goes mad, and justice becomes more and more opaque.  Her narration becomes more fevered, more disgusted with the filth around her.  But she has yet to look in the mirror.  



This is a great, terrifying book.  I suspected I would find the social scene of the novel foreign, but it was frighteningly familiar.  Perhaps the she devil in the mirror isn’t Laura’s society, but ours.

10 September 2011

French tidbits

                                                             
            I’ve been reading Graham Robb’s Parisians: an adventure history of Paris with unexpected delight.  The research is meticulous, yet the prose is light and quick.  The anecdotes are fascinating: Napoleon’s youthful encounter with a prostitute before his rise to power, Marie Antoinette’s failed escape due to want of a good map, and so on.  Great reading.


            From the book I learned that Paris once had a street named Rue d’Enfer, the road of hell.  In 1774, a great chasm suddenly opened up forming a sinkhole.  Several houses on the Rue d’Enfer were swallowed up by the earth.  This event lead architectural genius Charles-Axel Guillaumot to discover that most of the city was in peril due to ancient mining tunnels snaking through the ground below houses, churches, and taverns alike.  Half the city was propped up on unstable piles of quarried stones.  He rebuilt the Parisian underground, and the name of the street was changed.


            While it is understandable that people at the time believed the road was named prophetically, the etymology of the street name was mysterious.  Today, the source is considered unknown, but etymologists of the period were somewhat more inventive, in all senses of the word:

“in the days of the Romans, the Rue St. Jacques was the Via Superior, while this street, being the lower of the two, was the Via Inferior or Infera.  And so it was that, by corruption and contraction, it assumed the name ENFER.”
(Hurtaut and Magny, Dictionnaire historique de la ville de Paris et de ses environs.  Paris, 1779.)

I prefer the old to the new.  Happy reading.